Поетика драматургії Єлисея Карпенка
Дата
2015-02-27
Автори
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Харківський національний університет імені В.Н.Каразіна
Анотація
Сироватська М. І. Поетика драматургії Єлисея Карпенка. – На правах рукопису.
Дисертація на здобуття наукового ступеня кандидата філологічних наук
за спеціальністю 10.01.01 – українська література. – Харківський національний університет імені В. Н. Каразіна Міністерства освіти і науки України,
Харків, 2014.
У дисертації здійснено цілісний аналіз поетики опублікованих драматичних творів Є. Карпенка 1920-х рр. за допомогою дослідження мотивного комплексу, концепції персонажа й світу, часопросторових координат, образно-символічного наповнення, паратексту, жанрових модифікацій тощо.
У заявлених текстах домінантною є модерністська художня парадигма
з властивим їй зверненням до універсальних онтологічних категорій, що оприявнюється крізь призму ніцшеанського дискурсу, елементів естетики символізму й експресіонізму. Визначено своєрідність художнього універсуму драматургії митця, що полягає у проблемно-тематичній різновекторності, апеляції до міфопоетики, посиленій умовності основних світомоделюючих координат, символізації часопросторового рівня тощо. Аналіз п’єс Є. Карпенка дає можливість зробити висновок про їхню орієнтацію на «новодраматичний» тип конфлікту «людина–Стіна», що на поетикальному рівні виявляється через послаблення драматургічної динаміки, особливе навантаження вербальної площини, трансформацію ремарок у ритмотвірний та сугестуючий засіб, тенденції до міжродових і міжжанрових взаємовпливів.
Опис
Syrovatska M. I. The poetics of Yelisey Karpenko’s drama. – The manuscript rights.
The thesis for the degree of Candidate of Philological Studies, speciality
10.01.01 – Ukrainian literature. – V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, Kharkiv, 2014.
In the thesis the poetics of Ye. Karpenko’s published drama of the 1920-s
is analysed by means of studying the motif complex, a person and the world conception, time and space coordinates, figurative and symbolic filling, paratext, genre modifications, etc. It is established that in the author’s plays (“Edelweiss”, “White Nights”, “Soil”, “In the Valley of Tears”, “Momot Nir”, “At Holy Night”,
“At Autumn night”) dominant is modernist artistic paradigm that has a peculiar appeal to universal ontological categories that show themselves through the prism
of Nietzschean ideas, elements of symbolism and expressionism aesthetics.
The conception of personality that is in the conflict relationships with the entity
is also defined and is represented by diverse gallery of characters of a human being-“alive symbol” and -marionette. The art conflict of corporeal and spiritual as well
as the motive of ontological waiting is conceptual and runs through the whole drama
of the writer.
The analysis of Ye. Karpenko’s plays gave an opportunity to make
a conclusion about their orientation to the “new drama” type of the conflict
“a person–a wall”, which on the poetical level manifests itself through drama dynamic’s relaxation, special strain of verbal level, remarks’ transformation into rhyme- and suggestive-making way, tendencies of intergeneric and intergenre interference, sketchiness, etc. The existential level of the problems is dominant;
it is represented by motives of love, ownership (filling), illness, brutality, keeping silence, orphanhood, world’s absurdity, person’s alienation, longliness, grief, predestination in post-revolution reality, death inevitability, etc. The originality of art universe of artist’s drama that is in the problem- thematic of multidirectionality,
an appeal for myth-poetical level, intensified conventionality of the main world-modelling coordinates, special symbolization of time-space level and others
is defined. The dominating idea of temporal model of the title (“White Nights”,
“At Autumn night”, “At Holy Night”) that is author-textual and genre-making (“festal” drama) is stressed. The idea of disharmony of the reality, which is realized on the different poetical levels: character’s (dramatis personae have obvious physical or psychological deficiency); literary speech (quite often they name their own pathological state) and symbolical (the system of images-symbols gives
an opportunity to create the integral notion of the state of general morbidity
of the environment), is fundamental for Ye. Karpenko’s art world of drama.
The interpretation of the model of the chronotope of the artist’s drama allows
to state running through appeal to mythopoetics, which is symbolic for modernistic conception of action. It is established that four nature elements (earth, water, fire and air (wind)) make a concentrated model of the art universe of playwright’s dramas.
It is characteristic that such appeal to the elements in Ye. Karpenko’s works is always connected with the idea of verticality as spiritual superiority (a mountain/earth being associated with the “top” is traditionally opposite to water/abyss that is associated with the “bottom”). It is proved that material fullness of literary style of author’s drama works is practically main condition of text’s integral perception and plays extremely important sense-forming part, as it is the sphere of representation
of characters’ activity, as well as reflects their internal world, shows existential state of nervousness, alarm, dependence, obsession, intuitive-spiritual sphere of person’s entity. The central space image of the art universe of the plays is locus of house
(as a Swiss house, a hut, a palace, a lodging, a wall of the house, etc) that
in the majority of the artist’s works in spite of traditional semantics of stability, reliability and protection signs sickliness, betrayal, forlornness, independence and death. It’s defined that due to unreal, temporal and locative categories the author managed to show the unique essence of a person in the attempt of finding himself/herself in the condition of abnormal reality in an integral and fundamental way.
The analysis proved the presence in the artist’s drama of the great number
of intertextual parallels: an appeal to Ancient Greek mythology, bible allusions, cites of T. Shevchenko’s, O. Oles’, M. Voronyi’s works, knowledge of the history
of the world national liberation movement, etc. It was as well discovered that intermedialety as author’s strategy appears as sense-forming characteristics and gives metatext characteristics to symbolist plays of the author. Among its methods
in the drama sense-forming part of musical source, sound-description, rhythm-intonation organisation of the texts, emphasising of the colour model, using
of choreographical elements and others should be named. The author’s works
is represented in a wide Ukrainian and world literary and art context that allows
to make conclusions about the place and the part of Ye. Karpenko’s drama
of the 1920-s as a “transitive” phenomenon in the literature of the modernism age.
Through the mediation of intertextual and authotextual types of analysis
the aesthetic heterogeneity of Ye. Karpenko’s drama is established. Plays “Soil” and “In the Valley of Tears” stand out due to their original interpretation
of the precedented motive of infanticide in the spirit of expressionism aesthetics.
The symbolist model of the world that is realized in the drama poem “White Nights” and drama “Edelweiss” through powerful myth-poetical aspect is unique. Running through in their symbolism one-act plays “At Holy Night” and “At Autumn night” represents the peculiarity of action-free symbolist theatre of M. Maeterlinck. Taking into account the originality of plays of the author the prospectivity of further workshops on the artist’s plays in general and some of its aspects in particular (as for example, myth-poetical paradigms, Bible code, intermedial component, etc) should be named as perspective.
Ключові слова
поетика, модернізм, символізм, експресіонізм, міфопоетика, «нова драма», конфлікт, драматургічна ремарка
Бібліографічний опис
Дисертація на здобуття наукового ступеня кандидата філологічних наук за спеціальністю 10.01.01 — українська література